• Previous message: Bjarni R. Einarsson: "Request for comments: sanitizer.procmail sample rule"
• In reply to: Bjarni R. Einarsson: "Re: Add header according to virus scanner output"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Thursday 13 May 2004 15:31, you wrote:
> This can only be done after-the-fact, as Anomy scans the mail
> from beginning to end - to add a header after it's done scanning
> it would have to backtrack to the beginning of the message.

Oh ok, well then I need not bother trying to add this and sending a patch :)

> However, if you're using procmail this sort of thing can easily be
> done after the fact using a follow-up rule after the rule which
> calls the sanitizer, using formail to insert the header.

No we don't use procmail. We have a setup with an LDAP Server, postfix and
Cyrus. No local unix users.

> Other environments can almost certainly achieve similar results,
> but I'm less familiar with them.

Well I'd have to look for a way to do this with cyrus/sieve. If anyone has any
ideas yet... Maybe I will just pipe the mails through another script which
looks at a log file before pushing it into the spam filter from scan-mail.pl

Alex

• Next message: Mark Janssen: "Re: Request for comments: sanitizer.procmail sample rule"
• Previous message: Bjarni R. Einarsson: "Request for comments: sanitizer.procmail sample rule"
• In reply to: Bjarni R. Einarsson: "Re: Add header according to virus scanner output"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]