QUOTED_MESSAGE: > On 2002-10-07, 18:23:19 (+0100), Mike Scott > wrote: [SNIP] > > I keep getting this question... basically, the answer > is "nope" - simply because the Sanitizer is a > *filter* which processes the entire message in a single > pass. > > To add a header, it would need to make first one pass > to scan the message and then another to add the header and > then rewrite the message body. > > But... > > This sort of behavior can be implemented with a little > help from Procmail or other wrapper scripts. Anomy can be > configured to return a nonzero exit code when it encounters > a virus or the modification score exceeds a certain > amount. > > Assuming you are using procmail, the rule which passes > the message through Anomy can be immediately followed by a > rule which checks the exit code and if it's nonzero, either > add a status header or save the message to a special > mailbox. > > This was the idea anyway - the problem is, I've never > actually gotten it to work because of Procmail's insistance > on recovering the original message if the filtering rule > appears to fail! :-) If anyone can get this to work, please > share with the mailing list! > > > Another solution, which isn't quite as elegant (but is > OTOH much more flexible), is to wrap the Sanitizer in a > script which will redirect it's STDERR log to a file, which > can then be grepped for indications of a virus infection > after filtering. The ultimate fate of the message can then > be based on what sort of info is found in the log > file.

  EKKI skrifa neitt hér: