Next message: ¿õÁøÄÚ¿þÀ: "[È«º¸]¼¿ï ¼öµ¾¹°¿¡¼ ¹ÙÀÌ·¯½º ¹ß°ß-¿õÁøÄÚ¿þÀ"
On 2001-09-18, 11:40:13 (-0400), Jim Rosenberg wrote:
> then I get the same results on the production machine as the
> development machine. It looks like on the production machine I'm
> picking up the *wrong version* of MIMEStream.pm, which would explain
> a lot.
> Suggestion: maybe testall.sh should include something like setenv
> PERL5OPT -I../bin, and a message to be sure to install the modules in
> ../bin into your Perl library??
It does, but the path is appended to the include list, which means
the system defaults come first. I'd say this is actually the correct
behavior for the test cases, since you want them to fail if the
installation is unlikely to work - which it is if you forget to
update the stuff in the Perl library like you did.
I don't currently recommend installing the Anomy stuff into the Perl
library - until I've CPANified my code I think it's best to keep it
self contained and use the ANOMY environment variable to set the
library paths. This is the documented installation procedure, not
following it is likely to cause trouble.
I'll have to give this all some more thought.
Which do people prefer - a self contained installation in a single
directory (the way I do it today) or an installation which follows
the file-system standards, installing the libraries into the Perl
lib directory, the binaries into /usr/bin or /usr/local/bin, etc.?
Bjarni R. Einarsson PGP: 02764305, B7A3AB89
email@example.com -><- http://bre.klaki.net/
Check out my open-source email sanitizer: http://mailtools.anomy.net/